- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
Hey everyone, here are some updates regarding Zolgensma’s clinical trial phase.
First article: https://smanewstoday.com/2019/05/08/aanam-zolgensma-continues-to-extend-survival-in-sma-type-1-patients-several-years-after-dosing/.
These are just the scientific results right now. More information will be available in the coming days, especially with the expected FDA-approval of this drug.
Do you have any thoughts on these articles?
-
It only makes sense to me that Zolgensma is showing to be more effective than Spinraza as it targets the root cause of SMA. It’s great, in my opinion, that for type 1 infants (at least for the near future) there will be options. Inevitably the drug won’t work for everyone, so at least there will be another choice. Of course the cost of each treatment is also an aspect that may be prohibitive to receiving treatment that these articles didn’t touch on.
-
DeAnn & Kevin, do y’all think it will be harder to get financially than Spinraza has been? I mean, I know it’s more expensive initially, but is only one injection instead of ongoing. I really hope they approve it for older people because that’s the one I want. I just can’t do Spinraza on an ongoing period of time.
-
Good question Kelly. At this point I think it’s anyone’s guess as to how the high price tag will be received. Thought I heard somewhere, just not sure where, that the drug company may be working with insurance companies to be able to pay over a period of time. Guessing the trouble there would be if the insurance carrier would change before it was fully paid. Then there’s the whole buy & bill issue for those of us on Medicare. I’m thinking institutions would be much more hesitant to take on that risk. It will be something to keep an eye on for sure.
-
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
